Volume 030 Number 1. Go to the previous footnoteGo to the next footnote Close this window
Footnote n42

Hicks v. Bell, 3 Cal., 227; Stoakes v. Barrett, 5 Cal., 39. But in Moore v. Smaw, and Fremont v. Flower (17 Cal., 223), the supreme court of California refused to sustain the doctrine advanced in the above cases