CANTONA INDIANS. Although they were reported as numerous and were widely distributed in east central Texas, the Cantona Indians have generally been ignored in studies of Texas Indians. In the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries they were known to the Spanish by a variety of names, including Cantanual, Cantujuana, Cantauhaona, Cantuna, Mandone, and Simaomo (Simomo). During this period they ranged the prairies between the Guadalupe and Trinity rivers, particularly east of the sites of present San Antonio, Austin, and Waco. They were most frequently reported along the Colorado and Brazos rivers, where their skill and success in bison hunting were often mentioned. The Cantonas were rarely encountered alone; instead they shared settlements with other Indian groups, and they seem to have been welcome nearly everywhere. At times they encamped with the Jumanos and their associated tribes or with Coahuiltecans (Mescales, Payayas, Xarames) near San Antonio; farther east they sometimes shared villages with the Cava, Emet, Sana, and Tohoho Indians, all considered to be Tonkawans; northeast of Austin they were closely associated with the Yojuanes, also Tonkawan; in eastern Texas they were frequent visitors at the Hasinai Caddo villages; and later in the eighteenth century (1771) they were associated with Wichita groups (Tawakoni, Yscani) east of present Waco. A few Cantonas also entered San Antonio de Valero Mission at San Antonio in the first half of the eighteenth century.
The linguistic and cultural affiliations of the Cantonas are difficult to assess. J. R. Swanton listed them as a Coahuiltecan band, presumably because of their association with Coahuiltecan groups near San Antonio. Others have stressed association with Tonkawan peoples and have argued that the Cantona language must have been Tonkawan. It is clear that linguistic identification on the basis of association leads nowhere in the case of the Cantonas. At one time or another they were associated with nearly every group in or near their area. The same judgment also applies to Cantona cultural affiliations. The Cantonas disappeared in the second half of the eighteenth century. When last mentioned they were living with Wichita groups in the northern part of their range, and it seems likely that most of the Cantona survivors lost their ethnic identity among the southern Wichita groups, particularly the Tawakonis and Yscanis. One question deserves serious consideration: were the Cantonas the same people as the Kanohatinos named in documents of the La Salle expedition? Both groups occupied the same general area at the same time, and their cultures as known seem to have been similar. This question can be answered only by further archival research. The name Simaomo, clearly stated in one Spanish document to be an alternative name for Cantona, is puzzling. Since another document mentions both Cantonas and Simaomos as being represented in a large congregation of tribes or bands, it is impossible that Simaomo was the name of a Cantona subdivision that was sometimes used as a synonym for Cantona.
Image Use Disclaimer
All copyrighted materials included within the Handbook of Texas Online are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 related to Copyright and “Fair Use” for Non-Profit educational institutions, which permits the Texas State Historical Association (TSHA), to utilize copyrighted materials to further scholarship, education, and inform the public. The TSHA makes every effort to conform to the principles of fair use and to comply with copyright law.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
The following, adapted from the Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition, is the preferred citation for this article.Handbook of Texas Online, Thomas N. Campbell, "Cantona Indians," accessed December 11, 2016, http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/bmc27.
Uploaded on June 12, 2010. Published by the Texas State Historical Association.